Home » News » DOJ investigating whether White House TV press pool’s coverage halt violated antitrust law

By Alanna Durkin Richer and Amy Taxin, The Associated Press, published on October 12, 2026

Select Dynamic field

Television news networks set up before President Donald Trump, first lady Melania Trump, China's President Xi Jinping and his wife, Peng Liyuan, arrive at the National Archives Museum, Sept. 25, 2026, in Washington, D.C. AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson

WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. Department of Justice is investigating whether the decision of the White House television press pool to halt coverage of President Donald Trump last month violated antitrust law, an agency spokesperson said Oct. 10.

Emily Covington, a spokeswoman for the department, said group boycotts among business competitors might violate U.S. law. “The Antitrust Division is simply investigating to determine whether these news organizations have violated the antitrust laws,” she said.

The announcement came after the television pool of five broadcasters last month ceased presidential coverage after the administration barred CNN, MS NOW and Politico from the White House.

Messages were sent late Saturday to the five outlets seeking comment: ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN and FOX News.

The White House press pool, which is a rotating cast of news outlets that covers the president, has become a proxy for the wider fight over whether the president, or anyone, can control the content of news reports — a matter of press freedom and a type of free speech, pillars of American democracy.

Last month’s developments marked an extraordinary escalation in Trump’s efforts to restrict news reporters and outlets that he finds insufficiently supportive.

CNN, MS NOW and Politico sued over the days-long ban. It was lifted after a judge handed the three news organizations a reprieve, which is in place until tomorrow, Oct. 13.

Television pool coverage of the White House has also resumed.

Jose Zamora, the Committee to Protect Journalists’ regional director for the Americas, on Saturday criticized the administration’s decision to investigate.

“The government should not use antitrust investigations to intimidate news outlets defending press access,” Zamora said on X. “The public’s right to know depends on that access.”

Taxin contributed to this report from Santa Ana, Calif.

The Free Speech Center newsletter offers a digest of First Amendment and news-media news every other week. Subscribe for free here: https://bit.ly/3kG9uiJ

YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

More than 1,700 articles on First Amendment topics, court cases and history