Official Logo MTSU Freedom Of Speech
  • HOME
  • ABOUT
  • ENCYCLOPEDIA
  • NEWS
  • IN THE CLASSROOM
  • DONATE
  • HOME
  • ABOUT
  • ENCYCLOPEDIA
  • NEWS
  • IN THE CLASSROOM
  • DONATE

Anti-Abortion Protests and Free Speech

This is a list of First Amendment cases involving anti-abortion protests and free speech.

Abortion has been one of the most volatile issues in the United States and at times, speech about it has implicated First Amendment freedoms.

In essence, there are two rights at stake: the privacy rights of patients and staff members at health care facilities and the rights of speech, assembly, and petition of pro-choice and anti-abortion protesters.

  • American Life League v. Reno (4th Cir.) (1995)

American Life League v. Reno (4th Cir. 1995) upheld the constitutionality
of the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act against a First Amendment
challenge.

  • Bray v. Alexandria Women’s Health Clinic (1993)

Bray v. Alexandria Women’s Health Clinic (1993) dealt with the First
Amendment right of protest and ruled that protesters’ actions were not a
conspiracy against a protected class.

  • Hill v. Colorado (2000)

Hill v. Colorado (2000) said a state statute regulating protestors outside
of health facilities did not violate the First Amendment and was not
content based.

  • Hirsh v. City of Atlanta (1990)

Hirsh v. City of Atlanta (1990) said an injunction prohibiting an
anti-abortion group from demonstrating near abortion clinics did not
violate the First Amendment.

  • Madsen v. Women’s Health Center, Inc. (1994)

Madsen v. Women’s Health Center, Inc. (1994) addressed the conflict between
the First Amendment rights of antiabortion protestors and women’s
constitutional right to abortions.

  • McCullen v. Coakley (2014)

In McCullen v. Coakley (2014) the Court ruled that a state law prohibiting
individuals from standing in a buffer zone outside an abortion facility
violated the First Amendment.

  • Scheidler v. National Organization for Women (2006)

Scheidler v. National Organization for Women (2006) said racketeering laws
could not be invoked to challenge antiabortion protests protected by the
First Amendment.

  • Schenck v. Pro-Choice Network of Western New York(1997)

Schenck v. Pro-Choice Network of Western New York (1997) upheld fixed
buffer zones around abortion clinics but said floating buffer zones violate
the First Amendment.

ABOUT US

Footer logo

The Free Speech Center is a nonpartisan, nonprofit public policy center dedicated to building understanding of the five freedoms of the First Amendment through education, information and engagement.

freespeechcenter@mtsu.edu

middletennstate logo

FEATURE POSTS

VOA’s global impact felt long after the Cold War

Neutral news sources could exploit today’s polarized mediascape to boost revenue − here’s why they may choose not to

What is Telegram and why was its CEO arrested in Paris?

A contentious 12 months for the First Amendment

LINKS

  • Home
  • In The Classroom
  • First Amendment Ads
  • First Amendment Encyclopedia
  • Publications
  • Contact
  • Donate

NEWSLETTER

Subscribe to our newsletter for latest news. Let's stay updated!

SUBSCRIBE