Home » News » Why is news-media access at the border an issue?

By The Associated Press, published on March 26, 2021

Select Dynamic field

A migrant man, center, holds a child as he looks at a U.S. Customs and Border Protection agent at an intake area after crossing the U.S.-Mexico border, early Wednesday, March 24, 2021, in Roma, Texas. A surge of migrants on the Southwest border has the Biden administration on the defensive. The head of Homeland Security acknowledged the severity of the problem but insisted it's under control and said he won't revive a Trump-era practice of immediately expelling teens and children. (AP Photo/Julio Cortez)

By DAVID BAUDER, AP Media Writer


NEW YORK (AP) — Access to government-run facilities housing young immigrants on the border with Mexico has caused one of the first tussles between news organizations and the two-month-old administration of Joe Biden. Before the doors opened slightly this week, the media was limited in depicting how people in U.S. custody were being treated, and how that compared to what was done in the Trump years.


What’s behind that? Here’s a look.




The phrase “a picture is worth a thousand words” is a cliche for a reason. And governments know it well.


“This is sort of the default that government agencies go to when things are unflattering,” says Freddy Martinez, policy analyst for Open the Government, an organization that argues for government transparency.


News organizations say they have repeatedly sought access and been blocked. The Associated Press, for example, has asked Homeland Security officials for access to Border Patrol facilities at least seven times, without a response. The Biden administration has pointed to the need to establish safeguards for COVID-19 transmission and protecting the privacy of children as they work to set up their system for processing migrants.


“I will commit to transparency, as soon as I am in the position to implement what we are doing,” the president said at a news conference this week. When pressed on how long it would take for that to happen, Biden said he didn’t know.


But some journalists called that hypocrisy given his pledges during the campaign. After the news conference, CNN’s Jake Tapper said that Biden’s stance was “not really in keeping with the transparency that he promised the American people.”




Some of them aren’t coming from the professional media but from people with special access.


U.S. Rep. Henry Cuellar, a Texas Democrat, released on March 22 some still pictures taken the previous weekend when he was part of a congressional delegation visiting a U.S. Customs and Border Protection facility in Donna, Texas. Those photos, taken through plastic sheeting, showed children, several of them covered with blankets, lying on mats lined side by side on the floor.


The Department of Health and Human Services issued some government-shot video clips and, on March 24, allowed an NBC News camera crew and reporter Gabe Gutierrez to visit an HHS facility in Carrizo Springs, Texas.


In the NBC News video, some children were shown lining up as oranges were distributed, and others played soccer at an outdoor field. Their faces were obscured. An empty dorm room, with four beds, was shown, as was clothing handed out to youngsters.


Though that access was an important step, Gutierrez and others noted that the HHS-run centers are where children are sent after processing at a customs facility like the one visited by Cuellar. The customs locations are considered much more crowded, and journalists have still not been allowed access to them.




The three presidents who preceded Biden all allowed at least some access, Martinez and other groups that are seeking more access said in a letter this week to Alejandro Mayorkas, secretary of Homeland Security.


Such access wasn’t always aimed at pleasing the press, though. Stephen Miller, Trump’s top immigration advisor, told Politico’s Playbook this week that he wanted the press to have access, reasoning that images of immigrants held at the border were something Trump’s supporters wanted to see.




Because bad information often replaces no information. A lack of good information creates a vacuum that activists on both sides of the contentious issue of immigration are only too eager to fill, says Dan Shelley, executive director of the Radio Television Digital News Association.


He says: “It is more important than ever that journalists be allowed the necessary access to report accurately and independently on the border patrol’s response.”


The Free Speech Center newsletter offers a digest of First Amendment and news media-related news every other week. Subscribe for free here: https://bit.ly/3kG9uiJ



More than 1,700 articles on First Amendment topics, court cases and history