Home » News » Testimony in trial of man accused of trying to kill Salman Rushdie heads into 2nd day

By Carolyn Thompson and Hillel Italie, The Associated Press, published on February 11, 2025

Select Dynamic field

Author Salman Rushdie poses for a portrait to promote his book "Knife: Meditations After an Attempted Murder," at the Deutsches Theater in Berlin, Germany, May 16, 2024. AP Photo/Ebrahim Noroozi, file

Testimony is set to continue today, Feb. 11, in the trial of the man charged with stabbing famed author Salman Rushdie in a frenzied knife attack on a Western New York stage.

Jurors in the trial of Hadi Matar, 27, on Feb. 10 heard from staffers at the arts institution where Rushdie was set to give a speech in August 2022, when authorities say the Fairview, N.J., man attacked the author on stage and stabbed him more than a dozen times.

Rushdie himself is expected to testify during the trial.

Matar has been in custody since he was subdued by spectators after the attack. He has pleaded not guilty to attempted murder and assault.

The 77-year-old author was blinded in one eye in the attack and spent months recovering, a process he detailed in a memoir released last year. A speaker who was to appear with Rushdie also was wounded.

The trial is projected to last up to two weeks. Jurors are expected to be shown video and photos from the day of the attack.

They are unlikely, however, to hear about a fatwa issued by the late Iranian leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini calling for Rushdie’s death, according to District Attorney Jason Schmidt.

Rushdie, the author of Midnight’s Children and Victory City, spent years in hiding after Khomeini announced the fatwa in 1989 after publication of his novel The Satanic Verses, which some Muslims consider blasphemous

Schmidt has said discussing Matar’s motive will be unnecessary in the state trial, given that the attack was seen by the live audience that was present to hear Rushdie speak.

“This is not a case of mistaken identity,” Schmidt said during his opening statements on Monday. “Mr. Matar is the person who attacked Mr. Rushdie without provocation.”

A public defender representing Matar, however, told jurors that the case is not as straightforward as prosecutors made it out to be.

“The elements of the crime are more than ‘something really bad happened’ — they’re more defined,” Lynn Schaffer said. “Something bad did happen, something very bad did happen, but the district attorney has to prove much more than that.”

In a separate indictment, federal authorities allege that Matar was driven to act by a terrorist organization’s 2006 endorsement of the fatwa. A later trial on federal terrorism charges will be scheduled in U.S. District Court in Buffalo.

The Free Speech Center newsletter offers a digest of First Amendment and news-media news every other week. Subscribe for free here: https://bit.ly/3kG9uiJ

YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

More than 1,700 articles on First Amendment topics, court cases and history