Home » News » Judge dismisses Palin libel lawsuit against New York Times

By The Associated Press, published on February 14, 2022

Select Dynamic field

Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin outside U.S. District Court in New York in early February. AP Photo

By TOM HAYS, Associated Press


NEW YORK (AP) — A judge said today (Feb. 14) he’ll dismiss a libel lawsuit that former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin filed against The New York Times, claiming the newspaper damaged her reputation with an editorial falsely linking her campaign rhetoric to a mass shooting.


U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff made the ruling with a jury still deliberating in a New York City trial where the former Alaska governor and vice-presidential candidate testified last week.


The judge said Palin had failed to show that the Times had acted out of malice, something required in libel lawsuits involving public figures.
Rakoff says he’ll let jury deliberations continue in case his decision winds up being reversed on appeal.


“This is the kind of case that inevitably goes up on appeal,” Rakoff said in an explanation from the bench.


The jury concluded the day without reaching a verdict. They were to resume deliberating Feb. 15.


Outside the courthouse, Palin expressed bafflement over the judge taking a position before jurors made their own decision.


“This is a jury trial and we always appreciate the system. So whatever happened in there usurps the system,” she said.


Palin sued the Times in 2017, claiming the newspaper had damaged her career as a political commentator and consultant with the editorial about gun control published after U.S. Rep. Steve Scalise, a Louisiana Republican, was wounded when a man with a history of anti-GOP activity opened fire on a congressional baseball team practice in Washington, D.C.


In the editorial, the Times wrote that before the 2011 mass shooting in Arizona that severely wounded former U.S. Rep. Gabby Giffords and killed six others, Palin’s political action committee had contributed to an atmosphere of violence by circulating a map of electoral districts that put Giffords and 19 other Democrats under stylized crosshairs.


The Times acknowledged that the editorial wrongly described both the map, and any link to the shooting, but said the mistake wasn’t intentional.


The Free Speech Center newsletter offers a digest of First Amendment and news media-related news every other week. Subscribe for free here: https://bit.ly/3kG9uiJ



More than 1,700 articles on First Amendment topics, court cases and history