Official Logo MTSU Freedom Of Speech
  • HOME
  • ABOUT
  • ENCYCLOPEDIA
  • NEWS
  • IN THE CLASSROOM
  • DONATE
  • HOME
  • ABOUT
  • ENCYCLOPEDIA
  • NEWS
  • IN THE CLASSROOM
  • DONATE

Solicitation and Pamphleteering Cases

  • Breard v. Alexandria (1951)

Breard v. Alexandria (1951) upheld a city ordinance prohibiting unsolicited
door-to-door sales, ruling that the ordinance did not violate the First
Amendment.

  • Cantwell v. Connecticut (1940)

A 1940 Supreme Court landmark decision in Cantwell v. Connecticut affirmed
the religious freedom rights of a Jehovah’s Witness man to go door-to-door,
despite offending some citizens. And that the state’s breach of peace laws
were too broad and permit requirements left too much to discretion of
officials.

  • Cox v. New Hampshire (1941)

Cox v. New Hampshire (1941) upheld Jehovah’s Witnesses’ conviction for
parading without a permit, ruling that their First Amendments rights had
not been violated.

  • Follett v. Town of McCormick (1944)

Follett v. Town of McCormick (1944) invalidated a tax on selling religious
publications door-to-door using the First Amendment to reject this
restriction on religious activity.

  • Hynes v. Mayor of Oradell (1976)

In Hynes v. Mayor of Oradell (1976), the Court said an ordinance requiring
door-to-door canvassers to notify the police was vague and violated the
First Amendment.

  • Largent v. Texas (1943)

Largent v Texas (1943) said giving a city mayor the power to determine who
can distribute pamphlets is censorship and not allowed under the First
Amendment.

  • Lovell v. City of Griffin (1938)

Lovell v. City of Griffin (1938) overturned the conviction of a Jehovah’s
Witness who sold a pamphlet without getting prior permission from the city
on First Amendment grounds.

  • Martin v. City of Struthers (1943)

In Martin v. City of Struthers (1943), the Court overturned a ruling that
upheld the conviction of a door-to-door religious solicitor in a case
focusing on First Amendment rights.

  • Murdock v. Pennsylvania (1943)

Murdock v. Pennsylvania (1943) invalidated a city ordinance that required
solicitors to obtain a license. The Court found the law infringed on the
First Amendment rights.

  • Prince v. Massachusetts (1944)

Prince v. Massachusetts (1944) upheld a state regulation prohibiting
children from selling newspapers in public places, finding it was not in
violation of the First Amendment.

  • Schneider v. State (1939)

Schneider v. State (1939) invalidated several city ordinances that
restricted the distribution of handbills, ruling that the laws infringed on
the First Amendment.

  • Staub v. City of Baxley (1958)

Staub v. City of Baxley (1958) invalidated a city ordinance requiring a
permit before soliciting residents to join their organization, ruling it
violated the First Amendment.

  • Watchtower Bible and Tract Society v. Village of Stratton (2002)

Watchtower Bible and Tract Society v. Village of Stratton (2002) said an
ordinance making it a misdemeanor to canvass door-to-door without a permit
violated the First Amendment.

ABOUT US

Footer logo

The Free Speech Center is a nonpartisan, nonprofit public policy center dedicated to building understanding of the five freedoms of the First Amendment through education, information and engagement.

freespeechcenter@mtsu.edu

middletennstate logo

FEATURE POSTS

VOA’s global impact felt long after the Cold War

Neutral news sources could exploit today’s polarized mediascape to boost revenue − here’s why they may choose not to

What is Telegram and why was its CEO arrested in Paris?

A contentious 12 months for the First Amendment

LINKS

  • Home
  • In The Classroom
  • First Amendment Ads
  • First Amendment Encyclopedia
  • Publications
  • Contact
  • Donate

NEWSLETTER

Subscribe to our newsletter for latest news. Let's stay updated!

SUBSCRIBE