Official Logo MTSU Freedom Of Speech
  • HOME
  • ABOUT
  • ENCYCLOPEDIA
  • NEWS
  • IN THE CLASSROOM
  • DONATE
  • HOME
  • ABOUT
  • ENCYCLOPEDIA
  • NEWS
  • IN THE CLASSROOM
  • DONATE

Government Funding Restrictions on Speech Cases

  • Agency for International Development v. Alliance for Open Society (2013)

Agency for International Development v. Alliance for Open Society (2013)
said barring funding for NGOs not explicitly opposed to certain policies
violated the First Amendment.

  • Agency for International Development v. Alliance for Open Society International, Inc. II(2020)

The Supreme Court in 2020 ruled that First Amendment speech protections did
not apply to foreign organizations in affirming a law barring AIDS funding
to organizations that refused to affirm certain beliefs in Agency for
International Development v. Alliance for Open Society International, Inc.
II.

  • Arkansas Times v. Waldrip (8th Circuit) (2022)

The 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in 2022 upheld an Arkansas law that
requires contractors with the state to sign a pledge not to boycott Israel
despite challenges that it violated free speech.

  • Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System v. Southworth (2000)

Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System v. Southworth (2000)
said universities may charge a fee to fund extracurricular speech through a
viewpoint-neutral program.

  • Legal Services Corp. v. Velazquez (2001)

Legal Services Corp. v Velazquez (2001) said a prohibition on using federal
funds designated for indigent legal services to challenge welfare law
violated the First Amendment.

  • National Endowment for the Arts v. Finley (1998)

National Endowment for the Arts v. Finley (1998) ruled that requiring
standards of decency and respect to be considered with funding decisions by
the NEA was constitutional.

  • National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra (2018)

National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra (2018) ruled
that forcing pregnancy centers to tell patients about abortion services
violated the First Amendment.

  • Rosenberger v. Rectors and Visitors of the University of Virginia (1995)

Rosenberger v. Rectors and Visitors of the University of Virginia (1995)
ruled that the denial of student funds to a Christian-based magazine
violated the First Amendment.

  • Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights (2006)

Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights (2006) said that
conditioning funding on allowing military recruiters on campus did not
violate the First Amendment.

  • Rust v. Sullivan (1991)

In a First Amendment case, Rust v. Sullivan (1991) upheld regulations
prohibiting doctors receiving federal funding from providing information on
abortion.

  • United States v. American Library Association (2003)

US v. American Library Association (2003) struck down a First Amendment
challenge against a law restricting funding to libraries that did not
install Internet filtering software.

ABOUT US

Footer logo

The Free Speech Center is a nonpartisan, nonprofit public policy center dedicated to building understanding of the five freedoms of the First Amendment through education, information and engagement.

freespeechcenter@mtsu.edu

middletennstate logo

FEATURE POSTS

VOA’s global impact felt long after the Cold War

Neutral news sources could exploit today’s polarized mediascape to boost revenue − here’s why they may choose not to

What is Telegram and why was its CEO arrested in Paris?

A contentious 12 months for the First Amendment

LINKS

  • Home
  • In The Classroom
  • First Amendment Ads
  • First Amendment Encyclopedia
  • Publications
  • Contact
  • Donate

NEWSLETTER

Subscribe to our newsletter for latest news. Let's stay updated!

SUBSCRIBE